IT Management
Home >
IT Management > IT Sense: Innovative Mainframe Computing
 SUB DEPTS
Print this article

< Previous Page 1 2 Next Page >
HOSTBRIDGE

IT Sense: Innovative Mainframe Computing



by Jon William Toigo
December 1, 2008

When I was offered an opportunity a few weeks ago from CA to brief me on the latest release of its mainframe database product, IDMS—a database system that I knew in a former life as Cullinet—I took the meeting mainly out of a sense of nostalgia. I had much experience with Cullinet in the early ’90s, when the technology was being used as the foundation of the U.S. Secret Service’s post stander systems, used to coordinate the myriad details of protection services for U.S. politicians.

Hearing Greg Beedy, senior principle product manager for CA IDMS, so enthusiastically discuss the cool features of the latest release, I realized I had fallen prey to the very mindset that had been casting shadows on the future of the mainframe in the minds of many IT planners for the last few years. I was seeing the mainframe and mainframe databases as “old” technology that must inevitably succumb to something newer and better. Innovation and mainframe tech rarely found themselves in the same sentence in the trade press or in discussions with business clients. Upon doing some research to refresh my knowledge of the history of IDMS, it dawned on me that some important lessons can be learned about business and IT innovation.

What made Cullinet cool in its day was the fact its database was organized as files mapped to areas and subdivided into pages that directly corresponded to blocks on a disk. Originally, it was less a relational database engine than a networked one. Its design closely mapped to COBOL coding conventions, with relational capabilities added over time as RDMS popularity increased.

What really made Cullinet, now CA-IDMS, of interest to me was that its roots were firmly planted in business requirements, and not in the plans of a tech company seeking to finesse competitors for market share. The underlying technology was the brainchild of Dr. Charles Bachman at General Electric, who called it an Integrated Data Store. It was subsequently rewritten into a new portable language by IT folks within the Chemical Products Division of B. F. Goodrich, who wanted to enable it to run on several target machines deployed at the company to serve various business objectives. Over time, it found its way onto IBM mainframes as well as Digital Equipment Corp. boxes, but its development was done within a business for a business.

Somewhere along the way, B. F. Goodrich bosses decided the company wasn’t in the software products business. That opened the doors for John Cullinane to buy the rights to market the product. By the ’90s, Cullinet could boast more than 2,500 installations. Many of these, deployed as early as the ’70s, are still in operation today.

CA acquired Cullinet in September 1989, for $300 million. When they began adding SQL capabilities from a relational database technology, the once-heated debates waned over whether Cullinet/IDMS was really a relational database system or a network database with a relational veneer.
< Previous Page 1 2 Next Page >
This article has no comments. Be the first to comment!
 COMMENT ENTRY
Name:
Email:
Location:
Website:
Comments:
Remember my personal information
Notify me of follow-up comments?
Please enter the word
you see in the image below:
   
 SEARCH DEPTS
 MAINFRAME JOBS
Technical Associate – Mainframe Programmer
Charles Schwab
Englewood, CO, US
mainframe consutlant
EDI Specialists
NJ, US
Install/1 - Customer/1 Mainframe Programmer
Tekmark Global Solutio...
Columbus, OH, US
Mainframe
Open Systems Technologies
New York, NY, US
Mainframe Developer
Accenture
Washington, DC, US
Mainframe Developer

Jacksonville, FL, US
Mainframe Supervisor
Analysts International
Houston, TX, US
Mainframe Programmer
Triune Technologies Inc.
Los Angeles, CA, US
Mainframe Systems Programmer - z/OS
CVS/pharmacy
Woonsocket, RI, US